Friends With Difference of Opinion

Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opionions as them. Other people believe its good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.

Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Having a good friend is the most precious gift anyone can have. With that thought in mind, many people debate whether it is better to have friends who sometimes have differences of opinion. This essay sides with having a friend with an occasional difference of opinion and explaining each argumentative points evidence. 

A few observations offer support to consider friends always having a similar opinion as a beneficial option.

The initial point relates to frequent agreement fostering likeliness. For instance, a person who agrees with his friend on most occasions tends to gell well with him.

Along with likeliness, shared common interests strengthen relationships. This position is derived from how many people who agree more remain friends for a longer duration.

Despite the above arguments, an endorsement for drawbacks involving friends who always agree subsists. This kind of friend could lead you to make wrong decisions. For example, I can recall an incident from my previous experience, when I incurred a severe monetary loss because my friend supported the idea of investing in a piece of land that later turned out to be a wasteland.

While this point resonates well, occasional disagreement from a friend fosters better decision-making. When someone disagrees, we tend to have a debate and come to an apt solution to a problem.

In general, I would prefer to have a friend who sometimes has different thoughts than me.

To conclude, choosing a friend must weigh all available options, but the proper choice becomes more evident considering the advice above. This essay acknowledges the presence of particular circumstances all friends embody.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.